|
|||||||||
| :: Issues > Election Coverage | |||||||||
|
Summary of the first report on the Parliamentary Elections 2005
Summary of the first report on the Parliamentary Elections 2005 Shadow Committee for Monitoring Election اNational Campaign for Monitoring ElectionCivil Society Elections Monitoring Observatory
Three coalitions of human rights organizations have joined forces to monitor each of the three stages of the parliamentary elections for the purpose of documenti
|
|||||||||
| Thursday, November 10,2005 00:00 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Summary of the first report on the Parliamentary Elections 2005
Three coalitions of human rights organizations have joined forces to monitor each of the three stages of the parliamentary elections for the purpose of documenting the historical event. These coalitions are the Shadow Committee for Monitoring Elections, the National Campaign for Monitoring Elections and the Civil Society Elections Monitoring Observatory. These human rights organizations have no affiliation to, nor do they associate themselves with, the political activities of any party, political group or candidate. The mission of the coalition is exclusive to the monitoring and ensuring of free and fair elections, and they respect all political parties, whether the ruling party, the opposition, or independent candidates, according the provisions of the Constitution, the Law, and international human rights law. The coalition believes that yesterday’s vote differed from previous ones, as it witnessed several positive phenomena: the relative neutrality of security bodies; the absence of systematic instances of fraud; permitting civil society organizations to monitor the process both inside and outside polling stations, and to attend the vote count process; the cooperation of judges with the observers in order that they may carry out their mission; and the use of transparent boxes for vote casting. Nevertheless, civil society observers also witnessed violations affecting, in one way or another, the initial results of the first stage of the parliamentary elections. The results of this is the indication that the new parliamentary will not differ from the previous one. These violations are represented by the following: 2. Collective Voting for National Party Candidates 3. Violence and Bullying by NDP Supporters against Opposition Candidates & the Muslim Brotherhood 4. Coercion and Bribery 5. Misuse of Public Funds Recommendations: 2. Providing the Parliamentary Elections Commission with the necessary legal and practical resources so that they may oversee the voter registers in order to update and refine registers. 3. Using national ID cards instead of the pink voter cards in all future elections and referenda. 4. Separating the state institutions from those of the ruling NDP to prevent the use of public money and resources during parliamentary and presidential elections and introducing legal provisions that clearly state the neutrality of state owned media. 5. Monitoring campaign expenditures and funding and enforcing the LE 70,000 limit, and monitoring the use of religious slogans during the campaigning period. 6. Establishing a permanent judicial committee, encompassing the most senior vise president of the Court of Cassation and the Supreme Administrative Court. The Committee will have the mandate to appoint the supervising judges and will deal with all appeals relating to the electoral process. 7. Ensuring objectivity and neutrality of the security forces during the coming stages of the parliamentary elections. 8. Providing the candidate’s representatives and civil society monitors with official accreditations to participate in the monitoring of the electoral process during voting, transfer of ballot boxes and the vote count. 9. Amending the electoral system to be based on the relative list system to replace the current individual seat system, and allocating a percentage of seats to women. |
|||||||||
|
Posted in Election Coverage |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Related Articles | |||||||||
|
|