“Israel” lobby blocks NY lecture exposing “Israel” lobby

Wednesday, October 11,2006 00:00

By Michael Powell, The Washington Post

Two major American Jewish organizations helped block a prominent New York University historian from speaking at the Polish consulate here last week, saying the academic was too critical of “Israel” and American Jewry.

The historian, Tony Judt, is Jewish and directs New York University`s Remarque Institute, which promotes the study of Europe. Judt was scheduled to talk Oct. 4 to a nonprofit organization that rents space from the consulate. Judt`s subject was the “Israel” lobby in the United States, and he planned to argue that this lobby has often stifled honest debate.

An hour before Judt was to arrive, the Polish Consul General Krzysztof Kasprzyk canceled the talk. He said the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee had called and he quickly concluded Judt was too controversial.

"The phone calls were very elegant but may be interpreted as exercising a delicate pressure," Kasprzyk said. "That`s obvious -- we are adults and our IQs are high enough to understand that."

Judt, who was born and raised in England and lost much of his family in the Holocaust, took strong exception to the cancellation of his speech. He noted that he was forced to cancel another speech later this month at Manhattan College in the Bronx after a different Jewish group had complained. Other prominent academics have described encountering such problems, in some cases more severe, stretching over the past three decades.

The pattern, Judt says, is unmistakable and chilling.

"This is serious and frightening, and only in America -- not in ‘Israel’ -- is this a problem," he said. "These are Jewish organizations that believe they should keep people who disagree with them on the Middle East away from anyone who might listen."

The leaders of the Jewish organizations denied asking the consulate to block Judt`s speech and accused the professor of retailing "wild conspiracy theories" about their roles. But they applauded the consulate for rescinding Judt`s invitation.

"I think they made the right decision," said Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League. "He`s taken the position that “Israel” shouldn`t exist. That puts him on our radar."

David A. Harris, executive director of the American Jewish Congress, took a similar view. "I never asked for a particular action; I was calling as a friend of Poland," Harris said. "The message of that evening was going to be entirely contrary to the entire spirit of Polish foreign policy."

Judt has crossed rhetorical swords with the Jewish organizations on two key issues. Over the past few years he has written essays in the New York Review of Books, the London Review of Books and in the “Israeli” newspaper Haaretz arguing that power in “Israel” has shifted to religious fundamentalists and territorial zealots, that woven into Zionism is a view of the Arab as the irreconcilable enemy, and that “Israel” might not survive as a communal Jewish (Zionist) state.

The solution, he argues, lies in a slow and tortuous walk toward a binational and secular state. He has, of late, defended an academic paper -- co-authored by professor Stephen M. Walt of Harvard University`s John F. Kennedy School of Government and John J. Mearsheimer, a professor at the University of Chicago -- which argues the American “Israel” lobby has pushed policies that are not in the United States` best interests and in fact often encourage “Israel” to engage in self-destructive behavior.

The Mearsheimer and Walt paper, however, has drawn praise in some quarters in “Israel”, particularly on the left. So, too some “Israeli” writers, not least “Israeli” historian and social critic Amos Elon, have praised Judt`s writings on “Israel”. Nor are Judt`s arguments without historical precedent: Massachusetts Institute of Technology linguist and political philosopher Noam Chomsky, who is Jewish, has advocated a binational solution in “Israel”, a view that three decades ago sparked such anger that police stood guard at his college talks. More recently, the ADL repeatedly accused DePaul University professor Norman G. Finkelstein, who is Jewish and strongly opposes “Israeli” policies, of being a "Holocaust denier." These charges have proved baseless.

"There is an often organized and often spontaneous attempt to marginalize anyone in the Jewish world who offers a critique of ‘Israeli’ policy," said Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor of the liberal magazine Tikkun. "It`s equated with anti-Semitism and ‘Israel’ denial."

Foxman says such complaints are silly. "Nobody has called Judt an anti-Semite," Foxman said. "People who are critical of ‘Israel’ and of the Jewish people often flaunt their Jewishness. Why isn`t that an issue?"

Judt replies that he only reluctantly talks of his Jewishness, in no small part to inoculate himself against charges of anti-Semitism. "For many, the way to be Jewish in this country is to aggressively assert that the Holocaust is your identification tag," Judt said. "I know perfectly well my history, but it never occurred to me that my most prominent identity was as a Jew."